Minutes from the
Aug. 11th, 2005 Mayor’s Bicycle/Pedestrian Task Force Meeting
Meeting Attendees: Roger Alig,
Ken Carlson, Meg Chico, Susan Conlon, Bruce
Ellsworth, Barry Keppard, Alison Miller, Warren Mitlak,
Ken Naglak, Chris Scherer
Web site: http://www.princetonol.com/groups/bikeped/
Bicycle/Pedestrian Project Priorities
o
The Task Force has been focusing
on generating a priority listing of bicycle, pedestrian, and recreational trail
projects that will be used for the Township’s upcoming Capital Improvement
Program process. Members of the Task
Force have been working hard over the last two months in defining the projects
and in determining initial priorities.
Tonight’s meeting was focused on reviewing the projects and the
priorities. [Post meeting note: In
the days following the meeting, Ken and Ken reviewed then subsequently
assembled all of the projects and priorities into a draft final form, and then
sent them on to the Task Force for final review. The final package of project priorities is
attached on subsequent pages. On August
17th, Ken and Ken presented the project priorities to Chris Marion,
Pat Ward, and Jim Parvesse. The project
priorities were well received and will now be used in the coming months to help
inform the township as it prepares capital improvement projects for the next
six capital budgets. This process
should be complete by the November/December timeframe. Chris, Pat, and Jim said that they will keep
the Task Force apprised of the process as it proceeds and will come to the Task
Force for further information on projects as needed.
o
Sidewalks- Susan and Ken C reviewed the sidewalk project priorities that they had
assembled. Alison offered to group the projects into capital budget years and
then send these out for review [Post meeting note: Alison grouped the
projects into capital budget years by considering project priorities, proximity
of projects to schools, and by trying to time the projects to occur contemporaneously
with larger projects (e.g., Alexander Road orphan bridge replacement, Route 571
development, etc.]
o
Crosswalks- Susan and ken C reviewed the Crosswalk priorities. These priorities
mirror a number of the sidewalk priorities in priority and timing.
o
Bikelanes- Chris and Ken presented the project priorities for bikelanes. The initial focus of the priorities is on the
Princeton Junction area due to the impact of bikelanes in this high density
area. The priorities also draw heavily
from the Orth-Rodgers bike/ped plan, emphasizing the need for shared roads,
bikelanes, and roads with compatible shoulders.
o
Recreational Trails- Roger reviewed the recreational trails projects and the Task Force
members worked together to assemble the projects into budget years. The highest priority trail was the Rogers
Preserve Trail.
Upcoming Meetings/Events:
o
Sept.
8th-TASK FORCE MEETING, 7:30 PM. Potential agenda items: In-depth scoping out
of top projects; review of bikelane definitions (e.g., 4 ft bikelanes
acceptable?) potential ordinances- banning ATV’s from publicly owned land;
keeping bikelanes free of debris; Education/Enforcement issues
2006-2011 Capital Budget
Sidewalk Project
Priorities August 2005 |
|
|
|
|
Overall Sidewalk
Project Ratings |
|
|
|
|
Route |
Sidewalk Status |
Rating |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
36 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
36 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
34 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
32 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
30 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
30 |
|
|
Millstone Road (need to
coordinate with residents) |
|
26 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
Village Road- between |
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
22 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
|
20 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
18 |
|
|
Conover Road- curved
section at Aldrich |
Key Missing Link |
18 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
14 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
|
14 |
|
|
Meadow Road Ext- between |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
12 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
12 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
12 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Canal |
|
10 |
|
|
Village Road East- between
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Village Road East- along
one property at intersection with |
Key Missing Link |
10 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
10 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
10 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
8 |
|
|
Route 571- between Bentley
& Rabbit Hill * (1 property) |
Key Missing Link |
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Old |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Canal |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Village Road East- between
|
|
7 |
|
|
Village Road East- between
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Old |
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Relatively Easy Project |
|
|
|
|
# High accident area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sidewalk Status Key |
|
|
|
|
No Sidewalk on either side of street |
|
|
|
|
Mixed section of no sidewalks and 1 sidewalk |
|
|
|
|
Sidewalk on 1 side of the street |
|
|
|
Sidewalk Project
Priorities August 2005 |
|
|
|
|
Listed by
Recommendation for Capital Budget Year |
|
|
|
|
Route |
Sidewalk Status |
Rating |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
36 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
36 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
34 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
Village Road- between N
Post Road & Wood Hollow Road * (1 property) |
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
18 |
|
|
Conover Road- curved
section beginning at |
Key Missing Link |
18 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
12 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
12 |
|
|
Village Road East- along 1
property at intersection with |
Key Missing Link |
10 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
30 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
12 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
10 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
8 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
8 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Meadow Road Ext.- between |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Canal |
|
10 |
|
|
Canal |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
32 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
30 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
24 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
22 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
Key Missing Link |
14 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
Key Missing Link |
10 |
|
|
Village Road East- between
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Millstone Road (need to
coordinate with residents) |
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Old |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Village Road East- |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Village Road East- between
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
|
20 |
|
|
Route 571- between |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Old |
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Relatively Easy Project |
|
|
|
|
# High accident area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sidewalk Status Key |
|
|
|
|
No Sidewalk on either side of street |
|
|
|
|
Mixed section of no sidewalks and 1 sidewalk |
|
|
|
|
Sidewalk on 1 side of the street |
|
|
Sidewalk Prioritization Method
• Step 1: Began process
with updated Sidewalk Inventory
• Step 2: Identified Key Generators (e.g., train station)
• Step 3: Maps were generated by Brian
Aaronson (WW Twp.) that placed each generator
in the center of an aerial photograph
that also contains color coded sidewalk inventory
• Step 4: Identified missing sidewalk
links and key routes to generators
• Step 5: Created sidewalk project
ranking by scoring pedestrian routes for
distance to generator (2 points for within ½
mile; 1 point for within 1 mile)
and sidewalk status of route (2 points for no
sidewalks, 1 point for 1 sidewalk)
• Step 6: Tallied up overall scores,
that is the # of times a sidewalk project appears in various generator maps
e.g., a missing link with no sidewalks within 1/2 mile of a generator
scores
4 points (2 times 2). If this missing link appears in four
generator maps within
1/2 mile of each generator, this missing sidewalk link scores 16
(4+4+4+4)
• Step 8: Grouped sidewalk projects by
overall prioritization score
• Step 9: Grouped sidewalk projects into
capital budget years based on coordination
and timing of projects (e.g., Route 571 project,
similar projects together and giving higher priority to
sidewalk projects close to
schools
Generators
Schools: High School South, Maurice Hawk, Dutch Neck, Village, High School
North/Community MS/Millstone River School (as one generator), and
Municipal/Transportation: Train Station, Municipal Complex
Parks:
Retail: Acme, McCafferys, Windsor Green, Market Fair, Nassau Park, Village
Shoppes at Clarskville Road, Ellsworth, Princeton Arms (Old Trenton Road)
2006-2011 Capital Budget
Project Listing by Overall Priority
|
Overall Project
Priorities |
Scope of Project |
Funding Source |
|
|
Bikelane
construction |
DOT grant and
2005 Capital Budget |
|
|
Signing and
striping |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
|
Signing and
striping |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
|
Signing and
striping |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
|
Signing and
Striping/ center midline |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
Millstone Road
from |
Compatible
Shoulder Construction |
2005 DOT Grant
& Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
Compatible Shoulder
Construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the Road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget and County
funding |
|
Wallace Road/North Post
from Route 571 to |
Bikelane construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget and County
funding |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Route 571 Re-Design
Project and Capital Budget |
|
Old |
Bikelane construction |
Bikelane Grant & Capital Budget |
|
Village Road from |
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget and County
funding |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
2009 Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Wyeth property development
funds & 2009 Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Compatible Shoulder
construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
2011 Capital Budget |
|
Bike Path from
Route 1 bike/ped bridge to P. Jct. Station |
Improvement
and extension of existing path |
Capital Budget |
|
Bike Path from
Route 1 bike/ped bridge to |
Bike path
construction |
TEA-21 Grant
& Capital Budget |
|
North
Post from |
Compatible Shoulder
construction |
Capital budget |
Bikelane Projects Listed
by Recommended Capital Budget Year
|
Recommendations for
Inclusion in 2006-2011 Capital Budgets |
Scope of Project |
Funding Source |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Bikelane
construction |
DOT grant and 2005
Capital Budget |
|
|
Signing and
striping |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
|
Signing and
striping |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
|
Signing and
striping |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
|
Signing and
Striping/ center midline |
2005 Capital
Budget |
|
Millstone Road
from |
Compatible Shoulder
Construction |
DOT Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Bikelane construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
Compatible Shoulder
Construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the Road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget and County
funding |
|
Wallace Road/North Post
from Route 571 to |
Bikelane construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget and County
funding |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Route 571 Re-Design
Project and Capital Budget |
|
Old |
Bikelane construction |
Bikelane Grant & Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Village Road from |
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget and County
funding |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Bikelane construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
2009 Capital Budget |
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Wyeth property development
funds & 2009 Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Share the road signs |
Capital Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Bikelane construction |
Capital Budget |
|
|
Compatible Shoulder
construction |
DOT Bikelane Grant &
2011 Capital Budget |
|
Bike Path from
Route 1 bike/ped bridge to P. Jct. Station |
Improvement
and extension of existing path |
Capital Budget |
|
Bike Path from
Route 1 bike/ped bridge to |
Bike path
construction |
TEA-21 Grant
& Capital Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
North
Post from |
Compatible Shoulder
construction |
Capital budget |
Notes:
The suggested projects are based on the
recommendations of the Orth-Rodgers report (see figure 8 in the report) and
have been prioritized based on committee member input.
In general, it was agreed that the primary focus for
bicycle use should be on local (i.e., within West Windsor) generators with
secondary focus on connectors to neighboring townships (e.g., Cranbury,
Hightstown, Princeton, Plainsboro,
The committee continues to feel that a viable Route One
Crossing for bike/ped purposes is of utmost importance but clearly needs to be
coordinated from a regional perspective.
Pending funding of a bike/ped bridge from an outside source such as the Penns Neck EIS process, interim solutions should be examined
such as the use of
All road maintenance projects planned by the
township, county and/or state should incorporate planning for bike lanes
compatible shoulders or share the roadway designations as outlined in the Orth
Rodgers report.
Listed by Overall Priority and then Placed Within Recommended Capital
Budget Year
2006
o
Crosswalk with brick treatment to coordinate with
others in the neighborhood with pedestrian-activated lights. There are very poor sight lines at this
intersection..
o
Crosswalk
with lights. This is a well
traveled crosswalk. It is wide and not
well lighted.
o
Canal
Crosswalk
installation with lights and pedestrian-activated signs with flashing lights. This intersection has poor sight lines and is
the only access to Market Fair.
o
Crosswalk with pedestrian signs.
o
Re-paint
existing crosswalk and install pedestrian signs.
2007
o
Canal
o
Canal Pointe and
o
o
Re-paint
existing crosswalk and install pedestrian signs
o
2008
o
Crosswalk
installation and install pedestrian signs .
o
Crosswalk
installation and install pedestrian signs .
o
o
2009
o
Re-paint
existing crosswalk
o
Re-paint
existing crosswalk
o
Re-paint
existing crosswalk
o
Route 571 and
o
Route 571 and
o
Route 571 and
o
Route 571 and
o
Wallace and
# High accident area
Listed by Overall Priority and then Placed Within Recommended Capital
Budget Year
2006
o
Rogers
Preserve Trail – The recently
acquired Rogers Preserve, together with adjacent Township land, links
o
D&R Canal
Trail between Alexander Road and Princeton Golf course ― This trail will parallel the towpath, but
lie on the West Windsor side of the canal.
It would enable residents in Canal Pointe and nearby communities to walk
or bicycle along the canal to reach bridges across the canal as well as nearby
stores and businesses. It would closely follow
2007
o
Duck Pond Run
Trail― This trail lies on the
sewer line along Duck Pond Run between Penn Lyle and North Post Roads. It would provide a bicycle/pedestrian link
between these roads. It could be the
first part of a trail following Duck Pond Run to the
o
Zaitz
Preserve Trail ―The recently
acquired Zaitz Preserve, fronting on
2008
o
Canal
o
2009
o
Millstone
River Trail Phase II― The new Millstone River Trail extends from
2010
o
Trail along
2011
o